Columbia Footwear Bugalicious Boots - Waterproof (For Women)
$69.95
$115.00
Save 39%
Item #75438
Closeouts. Columbia Footwear's Bugalicious waterproof boots combine all the warmth and protection of a technical boot into a stylish package, comfort rated to -25ºF. 200g Thinsulate® insulation lends heavy-duty warmth without bulkThermashield insoles prevent cold from seeping inRemovable cushioned insole with arch support Easy one-pull lacing system with toggle lockDual-density rubber Flex-Shell uppersSynthetic and nubuck uppersFaux fur collarOmni-Grip® soleHeight: 6-½”Weight: 3 lb. pr. Medium width Closeouts. China. Runs small, order ½ size larger.
Average Rating:
Sort by:
By cj from St. Paul Mn on 5/4/2008
Cons:
Difficult Entry & Exit
Describe Yourself:
Avid Adventurer
Bottom Line:
No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: The ankle was so narrow I had trouble getting my feet into them, and the toe was too roomy. My daughter (with feet the right size for the toe box) could barely get them on. Sent them back.
By adventure seeker from Kenosha, WI on 3/26/2008
Pros:
Comfortable, Easy Entry & Exit, Good Traction, Lightweight, Warm, Waterproof
Best Uses:
Cold Weather, Snow, Wet Conditions
Describe Yourself:
Avid Adventurer
Gear Usage:
Cold Weather Living, Winter Sports
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: I went up to the Northern Central part of Wisconsin on the coldest days of Feb. 2008. These boots kept me very warm for being outside for 5 hours a day in 10 below and under conditions.
Great boot for the price!
By Tessa from Shaver Lake, CA on 1/27/2008
Pros:
Comfortable, Easy Entry & Exit, Good Traction, Warm, Waterproof
Best Uses:
After Skiing/Snowboarding, Cold Weather, Snow
Describe Yourself:
Avid Adventurer
Gear Usage:
Cold Weather Living, Winter job, Winter Sports
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: I use these boots both for work outdoors and as casual wear and they have turned out to be wonderful. I'd recommend them highly. My only gripe about them might be that they were a bit on the big size.
|