|
< Return to Previous Page
|
Wickers Comfortrel® Long Underwear Top - Expedition Weight, Long Sleeve (For Women)
|
SAVE:
$20.32
(59%)
|
|
Sale Price: $18.00 $13.68
Retail Price: $34.00
Item #12164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available Colors: Click to preview
|
|
05
|
06
|
11
|
13
|
15
|
40*
|
|
43
|
61
|
75
| | | |
|
|
 Email this Page to a Friend
|
|
Wickers Comfortrel® Long Underwear Top - Expedition Weight, Long Sleeve (For Women)
$13.68
$34.00
Save 59% Item #12164
2nds. Wickers Expedition long underwear top is ideal for stationary activities in the coldest temperatures. Warm and cotton-soft layer places fleece next to your skin for better heat retention.Expedition weightLong sleevesNon-pillingFabric: 100% Comfortrel polyester or at least 93% polyester, remainder spandex, may not specify.Care: Machine wash/dry2nds, barely perceptible blemishes. USA. Size: S(6-8) M(10-12) L(14-16) XL(18-20) The outer layer texture may be smooth or fleece, may not specify.Slight shading differences within colors.
Average Rating:
Sort by:
By Toni from Fort Collins, CO on 12/31/2008 Pros: Comfortable, Lightweight, Moisture Wicking, Snug Fit, Warm Best Uses: Cold Weather, Layering Describe Yourself: Frequent Exerciser Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: Nice and warm and so soft. The neck is a little big though.
Very warm for such a light weight feel By Mb from Quad Cities, Illinois on 12/29/2008 Pros: Comfortable, Lightweight, Snug Fit Cons: Can get damp inside glove Best Uses: Cold Weather, Running, Snow Sports Describe Yourself: Occasional Exerciser Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: I use them for working in the barn
By Always Cold in Winter from Midwest on 12/29/2008 Pros: Comfortable, Moisture Wicking Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: Use as a base layer in cold weather for outdoor activity for someone who is always cold in winter. Warm, comfortable, wicking and long enough to easily tuck. Usually wear a small; ordered a medium and it fits well. A small would have been too tight.
|
|